On 12/10/2010 01:20 AM, Joe Damato wrote: > forgetting to CC the list yet again... > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Joe Damato <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Petr Machata <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I noticed that 0.6.0 was already tagged in Joe Damato's tree. If that's for >>> real, then I think we should move ltrace back to its primary repository. I, >>> Joe Damato and Zach Welch all have the commit rights. If you agree, I'll >>> reseat my branches there too, and get rid of the github fork. >> >> This is not done yet -- I need to pull in Zach's patches and then it >> will be ready to get moved over. I apologize for my delay in pulling >> in Zach's patches, my work week got extremely busy very unexpectedly. >> I will try to pull Zach's patches in today and then retag 0.6.0. > > Zach's patches have been pulled in, I've retagged 0.6.0 on my tree and > I am ready pull these changes into the official git repository and we > can get rid of all the github forks. Once I've updated the official git > repository, I will ping the list again.
I still think we should fix the test suite for this release. Petr said he would be happy with simply commenting out the newly-introduced-but-broken tests from the parameters.exp file. They can be reintroduced immediately after the release (so they can serve as a reminder for the next milestone), but it would be good to expect all of the release's tests to pass. -- Zach Welch CodeSourcery [email protected] (650) 331-3385 x743 _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
