Edjunior Barbosa Machado <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > the current upstream version of ltrace shows an ugly testsuite result on > ppc64: > > # of expected passes 23 > # of unexpected failures 74 > > Taking a closer look, I noticed ltrace is unable to track mostly of > the library calls on PowerPC 64-bit. This seems to be happening due to > a failure in a PTRACE_PEEKTEXT call in the function sym2addr(), which > returns -1 ('No such process', according to perror()) that is saved as > a valid address for a breakpoint. The following patch ignores this > error and sets addr = 0, which means this address will be checked > again in the future. This patch fixes mostly of the failures in the > testsuite on ppc64:
Great, I noticed this problem, but haven't had time to look into it yet. It's fallout of my multi-threading merge. Thanks for the patch, I'll commit it soonish. PM _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
