Hello! I think, now the code is stable, that was proved by time. Please take a look at https://github.com/zenovich/ltrace I'm open to discuss and make any corrections.
With best regards, Dmitry Zenovich 2011/11/29 Dmitry Zenovich <[email protected]>: > And one small fix: > https://github.com/zenovich/ltrace/commit/89d670657803082581842624ec48f0e1e355be2c > > 2011/11/14 Dmitry Zenovich <[email protected]>: >>> The important thing is that all arch-dependent code is properly hidden >>> in arch directories and doesn't break unsupported architectures. ltrace >>> is full of ifdefs as it is, and I would very much prefer that we don't >>> add more of that. >> >> I did a lot for that. The only ifdefs I've added were related to the >> python library availability. >> >>> Posting the patch series would be the first step. Or you could upload >>> your repository to github or somewhere and post a link. The point is >>> that others can review the code, even though "others" seems to be "I" >>> lately. >> >> You can take a look at the patch on github: >> https://github.com/zenovich/ltrace/commit/e659aaf1b6c1b115776f29008a22bdb9dfa9f3d0 >> >> With best regards, >> Dmitry Zenovich >> Head of Software Testing >> RB-Team >> Mail.Ru Group >> [email protected] _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
