On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Petr Machata <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > the branch pmachata/revamp was now merged to master. This following > list of changes still mostly holds: > > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/ltrace-devel/2012-January/000540.html > > In addition to the above, PPC and s390 were rewritten to use fetch > interface. They pass structures in registers, and therefore need it. > > i386 and x86_64 back ends were merged into an over-arching x86 back end. > The differences in those are relatively minor and can be worked around > by a handful of ifdefs. The x86 back end uses fetch interface as well. > > I also renamed target_address_t to arch_addr_t, to follow the logic in > naming architecture-specific artifacts. This is still a void * typedef. > Eventually it should become an integral type. First, because really it > is not a pointer (dereferencing it is not valid); second, it's not wide > enough to allow "inverse tracing" (x32 tracing x86_64 process, PPC32 > tracing PPC64 process; but note that x32 is currently not supported > anyway). > > I verified that on GNU/Linux, the test suite passes on straight x86's, > PPC's and s390's, as well as "cross" scenarios x86_64/i386, PPC64/PPC32, > s390x/s390. On PPC32, BSS PLT's as well as the new "secure" ones are > supported. >
What's the status of MIPS? What's missing for it? What GIT branch or tag are you recommending for MIPS? - Sedat - > Thank you, > PM > > _______________________________________________ > Ltrace-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
