Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 22:09 +0100, Petr Machata wrote: >> I meant returning e.g. -2 instead of -1 as a result, just to indicate >> that it unwound something, but had to give up. Your solution with >> "[...]" seems reasonable. > > But that is easy to detect. We keep count of the frames unwound through > the callback. So we now print an actual error if no frames could be > unwound at all and " > [...]" otherwise.
Right, I hadn't realized that. > Rebased patch attached. Thanks, that is fine. Applied now. PM _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
