Dima Kogan <[email protected]> writes: >> 1. filter_matches_symbol() and dwlf is leaking. Every time I call these >> we leak a bit. The dwfl is out of our hands, but the >> filter_matches_symbol() maybe could be plugged: > > I looked into this. Ltrace is definitely leaking it. The regex is > released when filter_destroy() calls filter_rule_destroy(), but those > are not called by anything.
Ah, there we go. I just saw that we call regfree, but didn't check whether we actually call those. Will you roll this into your change set, or should I look into it? Thanks, PM _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
