Petr Machata <pmach...@redhat.com> writes: > Dima Kogan <li...@dima.secretsauce.net> writes: > >> Do you think this is better? I can go either way. > > Well, this only adds the "exited" messages, and I find it better that > you don't hide anything from the user. The added "exited" is no > distraction at all, I think. > >>> I would also put the whole example in a section of its own, presumably >>> named "EXAMPLE", or maybe "SYMBOL FILTERING EXAMPLE". That should only >>> come after the "FILTERING EXPRESSIONS", as conceptually it builds on >>> what's written there. It would however be good to refer to this new >>> section from -e, -x and -l. >> >> Sure? I think the way it is now is better. Both putting the examples >> first (all perl docs do that, and they tend to be very good) and putting >> them into the same section (but different subsections). If you don't >> have strong feelings here, I'd rather leave it. > > In my opinion, explanations of differences between -x, -e and -l don't > belong in a section that describes filtering expressions, which is a > logically lower-level topic. I don't have particularly strong feelings > about ordering though, so if you think it's better to put examples > first, then so be it.
OK. New patch pushed up. _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list Ltrace-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel