Petr Machata <[email protected]> writes: > Dima Kogan <[email protected]> writes: > >> If I removed the gnu++11 part from the ltrace.exp patch, and put >> that into dwarf.exp somehow, then we're good? > > Yes. > > In the new-style tests (e.g. parameters2.exp), we use file ending to > determine what's inside the file. Would it make sense to have a cc > ending for C++98, c11 for C++11, etc.?
Hi. I just uploaded a patch that does the filename-language-choice as you suggested: .c11 is C 11 .cc11 is C++ 11 .cc, .cpp is C++ (whatever gcc has as the default) This choice is still in ltrace.exp. The DWARF-specific piece simply renames its .cc -> .cc11 dima _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
