Charles, We are still examining LDAP, to see if it will work as a replacement for NIS.
We won't dump NIS, just possible offer alternatives, that's all. Jim. Charles Marcus wrote: >Jim, > >Is it the intention to switch the dependancy of Local Apps on NIS to LDAP? > >Thanks for the great work - 3.0 rocks! > >Charles > >>-----Original Message----- >>Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:00:37 -0500 >>From: Jim McQuillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: Vamsidhar reddy mullangi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] local apps 2.09 version >> >>Vamsidhar, >> >>You can't just replace NIS with .rhosts. they are different things. >> >>Even if you use .rhosts to say which machines are allowed access to >>remote services on the workstation, the workstation still >>needs to know >>who you are. That's what NIS is for. >> >>Jim McQuillan >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >_____________________________________________________________________ >Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss >For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net > _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net
