The User Private Groups (UPG) scheme is unique to Red Hat, and IMO is a bit ridiculous. I've never used them.
It has been my practice to create groups that actually do something useful, such as "faculty", "students", "finaid" and so on. Ken Barber On Thursday 20 June 2002 11:08 am, Janyne Kizer wrote: > I am using RH 7.2 and SO 5.2. We have a shared directory set up for > people to use > (http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.2-Manual/ref-guide/s1-users >-groups-private-groups.html). When someone saves a SO file into there home > directory, edits that file and then saves it to the shared directory, the > permissions are the same as on the file in their home directory. All other > programs seem to work fine (Gimp, Nedit, etc.) but StarOffice insist on > keeping the group the UPG. ARG! Any suggestions? -- "Rule by pressure groups is merely the prelude, the social conditioning for mob rule." -- Ayn Rand, "The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution" ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net
