We are currently serving about 25 desktops running qvwm with a dual p2-400 
with 1gig of ram and an 18 gig scsi drive. we used redhat 8 for the install.

Our previous server, which was working fine, except I dont like editing 
gnome menus for large groups, was a dual p2-300 with only 512 megs of ram 
and an 18 gig scsi drive.  that install was redhat 7.3, with ximian gnome.

My experience has been that ltsp has pretty low requirements until you 
start trying to run mozilla and openoffice.

-Jeff

> On Friday 17 January 2003 18:14, Werner Winter wrote:
>> Hello,
>> we set up a test terminal server and it worked well. So we want to buy
>> a new server hardware (about 15 KDE-terminals). Is the following ok?
>>
>> Pentium4 2,4GHz (or is a dual pentium better?)
>> 2GB RAM
>> SCSI-HD 36GB
>>
>> Werner
>>
> 
>       I don't know but I have a similar problem. just slightly larger 
scale,
>       
> 
>       I also need to run a big municipal database on one of my servers 
using
>       
> postgres.
> 
> I was thinking of 
> 
> 2 Servers, (Large Hard Disks) to store users files and database (they
> hopfully  won't have that many files)
> 
> 1 Application server to run the apps on running LTSP (mounting the
> users files  over NFS)
> 
> That way everything that needs regularly backing up is on one set of
> servers  and the application server can be a semi static image and if
> its too slow we  can add a second (nearly identical similar machine)
> 
>       I'm guessing this will work out that the Application server will 
need
>       lots of 
> memory, where as the file server will need lots of disk space. But only
> needs  to be powerful enough to do the database and file handerling leg
> work.
> 
>       I don't know wether thats the right way to go.
> 
>       Is it worth trying to keep static apps aways from the applications 
on 
>separate servers with LTSP?
> 
> Any Ideas?
> 
> Peter Childs
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts
> will allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all
> your  clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit
> encryption.  Get a guide
> here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will
allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your 
clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. 
Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to