On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 14:16, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:

> This does *not* solve the problem of slow graphics on 486s. I named it
> as solution for peak load distribution of *calculation* processes on
> the nodes; it would help to squeeze the CPUs for the last bit of power
> when number crunching software is run.
> 
> > Any other road well traveled than this?
> 
> 486 *are* slow for terminal X, even if nothing else runs.
> We got quite bearable results with 486-66 (or were they -100?) with
> PCI graphics adapters (16MB) and old ISA nics. YMMV, and 386 probably
> are not satisfying in most user's eyes.

Anselm,
You just broke my heart with that!! Yeah I have one 486-100 that just
about manages to run X.
Anyway thanks for the warning before I put too much wasted effort.
Your advert snip is well appreciated but too much hassels importing into
India. Good for me that the second network that we will convert has P-I
& P-II machines mostly but low on memory (8mb).
Now a new question...how is the memory on the terminals used? It seems
that all new machines that we are getting are with 128Mb RAM (apart from
video RAM) and once the client has booted can this memory be used???
-- 
Sudev Barar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to