Em Sat, 31 Jul 2004 04:34:17 +0100, Nuno Tavares escreveu:

 Hi Gary,
 
 I agree with Jim. AFAIK, NFS has an optional local-locking option (not the
 same as fs-locking) at mount time, I suppose it works for nfs-root also.
 This is the preferred as (usually) no data is dropped. However, if you
 disable it, I think you have no problem at traversing /mnt, but never
 tested. See mount(8).
 
 Anyway, is there any chance to have a second server? You could setup a
 highly available NFS server, that would certainly solve your issue, but
 requiring (of course) a second server.

-- 
Nuno Tavares
http://nthq.cjb.net/




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to