Title: RE: Thinish Clients - opinions ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

JAM>Message: 1
JAM>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JAM>To: ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
JAM>Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:39:50 +0800 (WST)
JAM>Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] Thinish Clients - opinions

JAM>Hi All

JAM>opinions valued:

JAM>I m going to build some clients to use for MythTV.
JAM>LTSP-server app approach does not work well. (video-jitter, client=256M) I wish to avoid all JAM>of the sound-deamon trauma.

JAM>Standalone X-servers work perfectly. (TV across the network, not as in local TV cards)

I spent a couple of weekends trying to get MythTV to play ball in the environment that you discussed.  I started out trying the LTSP-MythTV path, and I fell back to just trying to get MythTV to work on a standalone box.  I quickly realized the Myth is a very slippery slope, and it is under much more rapid development than anything I have come across before. 

The experience was painful but educational.  I realized how little I know about the insides of Linux and LTSP.  >From your posts, you seem to have a much better handle on these two items.  Like your post, I came to the conclusion that for Myth to really work, you pretty much need a network boot environment instead of an LTSP-style setup because each machine really needs to run all of that stuff as local apps.

Reply via email to