Jason,
Turning on the NFS swap would be great to troubleshoot the problem,
and maybe even good final solution.

Btw, I checked out the dm.org website. Way to go! Looks like a great
organization -- and you use LTSP!

bob




On 8/19/05, Jason Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > I can show you a site that will crash ltsp + firefox with 256M ram on
> > client, reliably, repeatably, and at the same point every time.
> 
> Ooo...tell me more!  I was actually going to post to the list about a
> problem we've had which sounds almost identical to that one, and I've
> traced it to the amount of RAM in the client.
> 
> Background info
> ---------------
> We're running the latest & greatest LTSP v4.1.1 on an up-to-date Debian
> "unstable" Dual Athlon MP w/2GB RAM system.  Our clients are various name
> brand and off-brand donated PCs, Pentium I and PII class.  The clients are
> running the stock 2.4 LTSP kernel.  Our users use GNOME and the usual OSS
> stars: OpenOffice, Firefox, Thunderbird, GAIM, etc.
> 
> Problem description
> -------------------
> In the past few months (since upgrading to LTSP v4 with X.org I believe)
> some of our clients would freeze up fairly often while people were
> working, usually while surfing the web with Firefox.  I could tell the
> kernel hadn't crashed because I could ping the system, but we had to
> reboot the client to get people logged back in (not cool when people are
> in the middle something else).  We could even reproduce the problem very
> reliably by surfing to particular web pages.  Here is one example page:
> http://ww2.lafayette.edu/~collegestore/baby-merchandise.html
> 
> This week I finally got the SSH server operating on the clients, so I was
> able to login and see what was going on.  Turns out the X server process
> was just gone.  Nothing in the X log.  The CPU wasn't churning.
> 
> The problem didn't happen on all of our terminals though.  At first I
> thought that maybe it was connected to the video chip in use, which would
> determine the X driver which might be buggy.  Then I realized that the
> terminals that could be consistently crashed all had 64MB of RAM.  When I
> bumped them up to 128MB of RAM then the consistent crashing stopped.  Woo
> Hoo!  Now it seems that the crashing isn't totally gone, but adding RAM
> *really* helped.
> 
> So Jim, does that sound like the same problem you've seen?  Does at least
> 256MB of RAM per client seem to make it go away?  I'm also thinking of
> turning on NFS swap, at least as a stopgap measure.  Anyone else have any
> experience with this problem and possible solutions?  Any help would be
> greatly appreciated!
> 
> Jason
> 
> --
> Jason Maas
> DiscipleMakers Systems Dept --  www.dm.org
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to