hmm . . . a five second test shows you to be most right. i was thinking
of internal stuff (my recent adventures in squid confused me). ping
should work fine. Though I stand by my netstat from the server and note
that you could refine it. netstat. grep out ltsp. make sure that each
ws (or however you define them) only displays once and that should do
it. there's probably an easier way to do it, but that's off the top of
my head.
Jason Maas wrote:
Hi Joe,
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Joe Auerbach wrote:
It won't respond to ping because once set up they have the ip of the
server, as far as I know.
Actually, that's not the case. If each terminal's ethernet interface
was using the same IP address as the server then the ethernet
switch(es) would get awful cranky.
Each terminal (like any network device) should definitely be using its
own IP address. My v4.1.1 terminals respond just fine to ICMP (aka
"ping") packets.
Jason
--
joe auerbach
systems administrator
pcb / rossman and co
614-523-4150
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
