On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, R P Herrold wrote: > On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Daniel Mealha Cabrita wrote: > > > Now it's me who's curious... > > > > I wonder why did you choose segmenting the ethernet at server side with a > >couple of [EMAIL PROTECTED], instead of using a single 1Gbit card and a > >switch > >with 1-2 gigabit ports? You also wanted a QoS effect? > > The load to the upstream side (largely text protocols without > graphic images to make the content 'fat') was much lighter > than the delivery of content to the X-server clients from the > LTSP servers. Gig ethernet was not needed there. Possibly I > should have run the NFS server with a dedicated link to each > LTSP server, in handsight, as that link was the next busiest, > after the links to the clients. > > [Tuning the link layout was determined by sampling the > interface statistics]
I am not quite certain where the NFS server is in your setup ? Is it a single server for the whole network ? What was the disk arrangement on the NFS server(s) ? Cheers, Andy! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
