Roland Holder skrev: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Verner! > > I'd be glad to see your solution descibed on the ltsp wiki. I'm > moderating a german ltsp forum and a lot of questions about problems > with 64 bit SuSE came there in the last few weeks. > > Thanks, Roland > > Verner Kjærsgaard schrieb: > >> sokol skrev: >> >>> Patrick Barber a écrit : >>> >>> >>> >>>> Scott Balneaves wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:14:31PM +0100, sokol wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Nope sir, 32 bit is not a unique solution. We have here biOpteron x86_64 >>>>>> server and in similar situation we compiled fuse and ltspfs >>>>>> on this server and it works like a charm. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Well, yes, if you compile LtspFS for 64 bit, then it should work as >>>>> well. I was simply trying to save him the recompile. >>>>> >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ok so with ltspFS compiled as 64bit and FUSE comiled as 64bit it should >>>> work native 64bit? where is the source code for ltspFS I have no >>>> problems recompiling, but is there more than just ltspFS that needs to >>>> be recompiled? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Everything is explained in details on >>> http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/LtspFS >>> In particular for ltspFS sources, you can read : >>> >>> >>>> Installing ltspfs on your LTSP server: >>>> >>>> * Grab a copy of ltspfs. This is the bit that runs on the server: >>>> >>>> cd /usr/local/src >>>> cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/cvsroot checkout ltspfs >>>> cd ltspfs >>>> ./configure >>>> make >>>> make install >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> Hi list, >> >> - I apologize for this strange posting, it's partly a test to see if my >> mail works at all. I'm stranded in a hotel room with only Windows >> internet access. >> >> - Now, I too asked questions about getting LDA to work. I had it working >> on SuSE10/LTSP4.2u4, but could not, no matter what, get it working on >> SuSE92(64bit). To my HORROR today, I couldn't get it running on a brand >> new SuSE10 installation at a school. >> - I started over again, reading the wiki and the web :-) >> - The error was that uppon inserting a USB stick, I'd get an empty >> KINGSTON folder. >> >> I finally got it working - and this is my first short report of what I did. >> >> The SuSE10 runs on a dual 64bit machine, i.e. it's a 64 bit version. >> That's where the catch is. >> >> A test with ldd ltspfs gave that a libfuse.so.2.5.2 was missing. Indeed >> it was there, but not in the correct place. And, worse, it was a 64-bit >> thing. >> I understood from the wiki and the web that ltspfs is compiled against a >> 32bit fuse. >> So I did the unthinkable, I just copied a 32bit version of >> libfuse.so.2.5.2 from my laptop (SuSE10 also) into /usr/lib/ on the >> 64bit target machine. >> This gave me one error less, ldd ltspfs could now find everything. But >> still no luck. >> I then realized that my fuse installation was severely broken. So, I >> downloaded fuse 2.6 from sourceforge.net in source code. Compiled it >> with no swithes or anything directly on my SuSE10/64bit. Installed and >> remembered to modprobe fuse into the kernel. >> I then checked and rechecked the wiki and finally fired up a terminal, >> inserted a USB stick and BINGO!, there it was. Everything works just fine. >> >> I then proceeded with the code/patch/rpm from Gideon Romm (Work in >> Progress, wiki), the system that is meant to give you LDA in a full >> screen RPD session. I followed the instructions given from Gideon on the >> wiki - and BINGO again. Works just like breeze, USB stick to be seen >> just as described. >> >> If wanted by the list, I shall report deeper about what I did. Again, I >> do not have access to just about anything at this time - I don't even >> know if this mail will hit the list... >> >> Still THANK YOU to the LTSP people and to all on the list for their help >> in this matter. Today was a good day :-) >> >> Best regards, >> Verner >> >> >> >> > Hi Roland, > Ok, so the mail made it to the list.
Wiki; I'm a little reluctant about putting stuff on the wiki. First, I'm not really very good at formatting stuff,- to get it looking right. Secondly, and worse, I would just hate to put something on the wiki that was NOT correct. At the moment I feel a little like a blind hen that just found to grains... I need to clarify my mind and to make sure I'm not misleading people. One thing, though. On the wiki I read that the output of the terminal name "(trouble shooting) from step 4" should exactly match the display name and so forth. No, that is not entirely correct. It's enough if only the hostname is the very same, a FQDN is not needed. I think I'll hit the bed now. Best regards, Verner ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
