Correct me if I'm wrong, but the idea on using FreeNX on ltsp isn't the gain on "speed", but the saving in bandwidth. Think about a network of hundreths of thin clients, and the bandwidth spent with them, and youl'l now what I'm saying.
> Isnt the NX protocol supposed to give you near native speed through caching? And I ask you, caching to where??? As long as this is a diskless client, there's no "local storage" to receive this caching, and use a remote storage for this will waste all the saved band. 2007/7/14, Faraz Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Did some testing over the past few days with Freenx and Ltsp5. My > purpose was to boot the thin client from tftp (just like ltsp does) so I > used an existing LTSP setup. > (...) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
