On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 11:27 +0200, Sebastien Koechlin wrote: > On 10/5/07, Alistair Crust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now my idea now (and I really don't know if this is going to work) is to > > have 1 dhcpd server (maybe 2 using dhcp failover as described int the > > dhcp3 docs) and then load balance the tftp services. > > You have such a high load that you need to load-balance ftfp?
150 clients off 3 servers at present. The load is mainly cpu and memory load. If the kids are all hammering something like firefox at a lunch break then the servers begin to flag a bit. Its not so bad when the clients are all evenly spread across the 3 servers, but if one server bears the brunt then anyone using it will find poor performance. > > Is your needs are relative to high availability or to high load? > Needs are spreading the load first, but keeping in mind that if a server goes down the clients will need to be picked up by the remaining servers. > On my setup, terminal-related load (dhcp, tftp, nfs...) is so low that > I can not see it. > > CPU on server is high because of users applications. If I need to > load-balance load, it would be on XDMCP level. > How does that fit in with Local Disk Access? -- ----- Kind regards Alistair Crust Systems Administrator Skegness Grammar School Vernon Road Skegness PE25 2QS TEL: 01754 610000 (ext'852) FAX: 01754 896875 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
