On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 08:12:27PM +0530, Sudev Barar wrote: > On 28/10/2007, Scott Balneaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:07:34AM +0530, Sudev Barar wrote: > > > > > I think ltsp3.x/4.x is something that needs to co-exist with ltsp5.x > > > since the reuse of older hardware attraction is only possible with > > > 3.x/4.x > > > > Why do you say that? I've booted ltsp5 on a 250mhz box with 64 megs > > of ram. > > > Okay it is back to bench for me to test and I would love to get it > working on older clients with decent speed even when I have to to eat > my words
Use gutsy, where we did a huge amount of work making things faster. The squashed root image, plus re-write of ldm in C have helped immensely. Scott -- Scott L. Balneaves | "Eternity is a very long time, Systems Department | especially towards the end." Legal Aid Manitoba | -- Woody Allen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
