hi, On Do, 2007-11-29 at 10:24 -0800, Anthony M Simonelli wrote: > We're running an Ubuntu 7.10 LTSP 5 server on an HP Proliant ML110 G3 server > and no other network services. We're using the "linux-image-server" kernel > since we have it running on real server hardware. My question is, would the > standard linux-image-386 kernel be better (claims to be more suited to > desktop systems) since what I am running on the server is mainly desktop > applications? I know that this isn't a specific LTSP question, but it does > relate in that what would LTSP services be considered, server or desktop? > the only advantage of using the -server flavour is that it can address RAM above 4Gig which the -generic flavour doesn't, if you dont have more than 4Gig i'd suggest the -generic one simply because thats compiled for desktop use. the -server flavour while it works as desktop kernel is not optimized for desktop usage and originally rather built for headless server machines with lots of ram ...
ciao
oli
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
