On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Jordan Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally I don't see the benefit to have an additional SSH server by > default running... if your network isn't firewalled, you've got a lot > more to worry about than an open SSH port. It's common network > administration practice to have a firewall in place - and who gives > their LTSP server a public IP address, anyway?
My ltsp server is firewalled _and_ I need to access it via ssh on the internet. Therefore it makes perfect sense to have a daemon on a firewalled port taking connections from the tc, and a second daemon on a NATed port accepting connections from whitelisted administrators. db ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
