Hi,
>From my recent experience, there is only one difference. For i386, you
will need to force the architecture
simply add --arch i386 to the usual command, and you're in business.
Best regards
--
\\|//
(@ @)
---oOOo-(_)-oOOo---------------------------------
André Laforest
Dessin technique et conception mécanique en 3D
Spécialiste d'application SolidWorks
téléphone / phone : 418 688-2959
courriel / e-mail : [email protected]
mobile / cellular : 415 578-3367
skype VoIP : andre_laforest
-----------------Oooo----------------------------
oooO ( )
( ) ) /
\ ( (_/
\_)
Le jeudi 11 février 2010 à 13:55 -0800, Ken Walker a écrit :
> I am about to order a server which will be used as a file server for a
> mixed windows/linux lan of about 8 stations and as an ltsp server for a
> couple of client terminals running on older pc's with plans to end up
> with a half dozen client terminals. I was about to order a unit from
> dell for the server when I ran across a comment somewhere that 64 bit is
> the preferred architecture for the server. I have stayed away from 64
> bit pc's for linux until now. I expect that my small lan would not
> overload either as far as processing capability is concerned, but I am
> wondering, should I use 64 bit? Is there any difficulty using a 64 bit
> server with 32 bit clients? I plan to use ubuntu. The terminals will
> be used for word processing, email, web browsing and not much else.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
