Le mardi 8 juin 2010 22:04:18, Steve Cayford a écrit : > I'm looking at expanding my LTSP installation with another server (I > already have /home, LDAP authentication, and CUPS offloaded onto another > server). It appears that the primary options at the moment are load > balancing across a pair of DHCP servers or moving to ltsp-cluster is that > correct? > > The tricky part is that I don't control the enterprise DHCP so will need to > use a DHCP proxy and it doesn't look like dnsmasq will do load balancing. > Ltsp-cluster sounds like the only way to go, does that sound right? > > Thanks for any comments.
You can also let the thin-client decide on which server it will boot. A server with a lot of load will answer later than the one with less Another possibility: at ldm login, users can be presented a list of servers. Then they choose on which server they login. Xavier [email protected] - 09 54 06 16 26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
