On Monday 04 Oct 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > i wonder if running ltsp-update-image somehow sets the default to switch to > NBD? reading it quickly, i don't see where it would. running > ltsp-update-image is completely unnecessary with NFS based setups such as > Debian, but a lot of documentation suggests running it.
My experience is exactly that NFS is installed as you say, but I suspect enough of NBD is also installed by default, that the mere existence of the image in /opt/ltsp/i386/images is sufficient to cause problems. I did report this on this list some time ago, but was told that that was not the case; so it could have just been an idiosyncrasy of our particular set-up. Or not. I suggest removing that image file and trying again. -- Chris Roberts +------------------+--------------------------+ | Distribution | Debian Lenny | | LTSP Version | 5.2.2-1~bpo50+1 | | LDM Version | 2:2.1.2-1~bpo50+1 | | Windows Manager | KDE 3.5.10 | | Kernel | 2.6.32-bpo.5-686-bigmem | +------------------+--------------------------+ | Distribution | Debian Lenny | | LTSP Version | 5.2.2-1~bpo50+1 | | LDM Version | 2:2.1.2-1~bpo50+1 | | Windows Manager | KDE 3.5.10 | | Kernel | 2.6.26-2-686 | +------------------+--------------------------+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the two and get a better understanding. http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
