On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Joseph Bishay <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is actually something I was thinking about.  Both buildings have
> a tower that are in line-of-sight of each other.  About 250 meters
> between the two towers.  So I am thinking that I can set up an antenna
> at each end and have the LTSP servers sync through that?

Certainly. I have done plenty of fixed wireless, and 250m LOS is a
dead easy shot.

Have a look at this comparison:
http://www.ubnt.com/downloads/airmax_comparison.pdf. In a short run
like yours I would probably lean toward the Nano Loco M5, simply
because range will not be an issue, so you will want to maximise
throughput and minimise cost. Noise is quite unlikely to be a problem
in the 5GHz band, but you could upgrade to the Nanobridge M5 if you`re
concerned about it. Be sure to use surge protection at both ends, such
as shielded cable and ends.

My one caveat when choosing outdoor equipment is to check the
operating temps for your environment. The Ubiquiti parts vary from
-40C to -20C on the low end of the rated scale, greatly narrowing the
selection in colder climates (although I have some Rockets, rated to
-30, that never missed a bit though -35).

This setup, for a few hundred dollars in hardware, should give you
100mbps or better of low-latency (2 ms) throughput and excellent
uptimes.

db

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software 
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker 
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to