On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Lachele Foley (Lists)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I have two servers.  They're not set up yet, but I plan to use them in
> failover.  Half of the clients will be assigned to one machine, and
> half to the other.  I'll use automated deployment tools (chef &
> vagrant, most likely) to maintain the machines.  I'll use those same
> tools to maintain essentially identical(*) virtual images (virtualbox)
> of each machine, but on the other host.  So, if one machine goes down,
> the other machine will boot up a VM of the dead machine and that VM
> will do the terminal service while the real machine is repaired.  This
> means that if one machine dies, everyone has to operate on half the
> normal resources, but at least things don't stop altogether.
>
> (*) The VM will look just like the normal machine in most ways, but
> I'll include some messages here and there so users will know if
> they're booting from the VM rather than the normal setup.
>
> I'm sure there are other ways to do what you want, too.

That's a really interesting idea.

In the meantime I realised that the tftp server is read only, which
makes failover so much easier =) I,.e. you don't have to start/stop
the service, you can just let tftp run on both machines and use ucarp
(or heartbeat).

http://www.pytips.com/2010/3/16/ip-failover-with-ucarp-on-ubuntu

ucarp is easier to use than heartbeat.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to