Στις 25-11-2011, ημέρα Παρ, και ώρα 20:34 -0500, ο/η Jay Goldberg έγραψε: > I've found that as fat clients these aren't quite as "snappy" as I'd > like them to be.
With regards to video performance, fat clients are *exactly* as fast as local, standalone installations. You can have 3D acceleration, VDPAU and whatever else your driver offers. 3D acceleration over the network (for thin clients) is more difficult to achieve and much, much slower. They only difference, performance-wise, to local installations, is in the disk access: * Fat clients have e.g. 1 Gbps shared "disk" (network) bandwidth. That's usually a bit faster than one (non SSD) new hard disk. So if one serves multiple clients with 1 Gbps connection, that would be slower than local installations. * But, since most of that read-only network "disk" is already cached on the server from previous requests, there's no disk rotation latency involved, which is a big plus in disk speed. It's somewhat like having an SSD disk on the server. * Finally, if one is using NBD with compression enabled, that's about 10 times faster than NFS and a few times faster than local disks, since more data fits on the same bandwidth. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
