> On 12 Nov 2015, at 8:00 pm, ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Centos seems to me to be a more formal linux. Very reliable.
> I think suze and ubuntu have many more features in their standard
> installations.
> Peter
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 7:15 AM, donais <don...@telupton.com> wrote:
>
>> We actually operate LTSP 4.2 on Centos 5; It's working very fine.
>>
>> On my way to upgrade Centos to 6 or 7, I can't find an adapted version
>> of LTSP 5 for these platforms and it's a mess to try to get it working.
>> I looked around and found Wiki-LTSP on Suze Linux. A test to install
>> have been succesfull in a record time frame and without a glitch.
>>
>> I'm on Centos for years but know nothing about Suze.
>> Can one can compare these two platform and give an advise.
Not disagreeing with Peter, just a bit of perspective
Most distros are pretty much the same.
Suse yast sys-admin tools are really really nice. Consistent predictable nice.
From a CentOS perspective RPM is familiar and easy.
LTSP natively happens on ubuntu so that is first and argubly easiest.
DEBs are different but no worse (or better) than rpm. Just baby-duck and
learning curve.
If I had to choose I would choose ubuntu.
James
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
