----- Original message ----- > Maybe the problem is in my head... :-) I'm actually just talking about > the title on the webpage, code and manuals already just say UST mostly. > > My problem is that managers are going to the UST website and noting > LTTng-UST. Then they shorten it to LTTng (as they don't know better) > which confuses everyone who knows about LTTng (the patches on the > kernel). Then, once it's been explained to them about the kernel, and > userspace, and how they're different and separate and so on they start > coming up with new things. Yesterday I managed to stop one of them > writing down LTTng-KST (kernelspace tracer). :-/ > > So, sorry for all the commotion. > > But maybe in the long-term we don't want to be called LTTng-UST? It's a > bit of a mouthfull and UST is short and sweet and doesn't share even > part of the name with another project. It's also better from a > marketing perspective. Just changing the title on the webpage and > changing the README would pretty much do it. >
I have no problem with these changes. pmf > /Nils > > On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Pierre-Marc Fournier wrote: > > > Hi Nils, > > > > I'm not sure I understand the problem you are referring to. > > > > You are always free to say just UST, the tarballs are called > > ust.tar.gz, the Debian package name is ust. > > > > In what context do you see the project called LTTng-UST? Do you feel > > that it comes from the website? Are you proposing a separate website > > be made for ust? > > > > pmf > > > > ----- Original message ----- > > > When discussing LTTng-UST I very often run into some confusion about > > > the name, specifically people assume I'm talking about LTTng. In > > > order to reduce the amount of confusion I suggest we rename > > > LTTng-UST to just UST. > > > > > > Pierre-Marc, Mathieu, everyone else, any comments? > > > /Nils > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
