I personally had problems with Eclipse running on OpenJDK, but as far
as jni.h goes, it seems to build just fine with it, or even with gcj-jdk.
More than that, while doing tests earlier this week I noticed
compilation warnings along the lines of "JDK rejected by preprocessor
but accepted by compiler, going with compiler's decision.", which I
don't remember having seen before. Not very reassuring.
However, those happened when linking against BOTH sun-java6 or openjdk-6
but NOT with gcj-jdk. So my guess is that I have been building the JNI
interface with gcj-jdk all along.
So the liblttvtraceread-jni package in the PPA right now builds with
gcj-jdk, and I haven't noticed any problems so far. Yes,
liblttvtraceread-jni, it's there, although I don't recommend using it
right now, it still has the marker_field bug in it. Wait for version
~lttng6 or for a new upstream version.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 10-09-10 03:40 PM, Matthew Khouzam wrote:
I have never used sun's java on TMF, I understand it is what we
support officially, but since OpenJDK and sun are 95% similar (same
code) I doubt this is an issue. I would personnaly worry about it if
you encounter a bug.
PS. Having ltt in a PPA is awesome.
On 10-09-08 12:15 AM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
Yikes, I lied about that. TMF also requires the liblttvtraceread_loader
to provide the JNI interface, which requires building against
sun-java6-jdk. Afaik, it's impossible to link against Sun's Java in
Launchpad, only OpenJDK (or GCJ).
I'm afraid we can't provide the JNI loader in the PPA then, unless we
want to port/support the loader with OpenJDK.
_______________________________________________
ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
_______________________________________________
ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
