Hi David,

Your patch says what it does, but nothing about why. Please elaborate.

/Nils
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:35 PM, David Goulet wrote:

Signed-off-by: David Goulet <[email protected]>
---
libust/buffers.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +-------------------
1 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libust/buffers.c b/libust/buffers.c
index 4e8004c..a82538b 100644
--- a/libust/buffers.c
+++ b/libust/buffers.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <stdlib.h>

#include <ust/clock.h>
+#include <urcu/urcu_ref.h>

#include "buffers.h"
#include "channels.h"
@@ -150,6 +151,18 @@ static void ltt_buffer_begin(struct ust_buffer *buf,
        ltt_write_trace_header(channel->trace, header);
}

+static int unmap_buf_structs(struct ust_channel *chan)
+{
+       int i;
+
+       for (i=0; i < chan->n_cpus; i++) {
+               if (shmdt(chan->buf[i]) < 0) {
+                       PERROR("shmdt");
+               }
+       }
+       return 0;
+}
+
static int map_buf_data(struct ust_buffer *buf, size_t *size)
{
        void *ptr;
@@ -208,11 +221,17 @@ static int open_buf(struct ust_channel *chan, int cpu)
        if (result < 0)
                return -1;

+       urcu_ref_init(&chan->buf[cpu]->urcu_ref);
+
        buf->commit_count =
                zmalloc(sizeof(*buf->commit_count) * n_subbufs);
        if (!buf->commit_count)
                goto unmap_buf;

+       urcu_ref_get(&trace->urcu_ref);
+       urcu_ref_get(&trace->ltt_transport_urcu_ref);
+       urcu_ref_get(&chan->urcu_ref);
+
        result = pipe(fds);
        if (result < 0) {
                PERROR("pipe");
@@ -222,7 +241,9 @@ static int open_buf(struct ust_channel *chan, int cpu)
        buf->data_ready_fd_write = fds[1];

        buf->cpu = cpu;
+
        buf->chan = chan;
+       urcu_ref_get(&chan->urcu_ref);

        uatomic_set(&buf->offset, ltt_subbuffer_header_size());
        uatomic_set(&buf->consumed, 0);
@@ -254,13 +275,17 @@ unmap_buf:
        return -1;
}

+static void release_channel(struct urcu_ref *);
static void ltt_relay_print_buffer_errors(struct ust_channel *chan, int cpu);

-static void close_buf(struct ust_buffer *buf)
+static void destroy_buf(struct ust_buffer *buf)
{
+       int result;
        struct ust_channel *chan = buf->chan;
        int cpu = buf->cpu;
-       int result;
+
+       /* Print possible buffer errors */
+       ltt_relay_print_buffer_errors(chan, cpu);

        result = shmdt(buf->buf_data);
        if (result < 0) {
@@ -279,10 +304,61 @@ static void close_buf(struct ust_buffer *buf)
                PERROR("close");
        }

-       /* FIXME: This spews out errors, are they real?:
-        * ltt_relay_print_buffer_errors(chan, cpu); */
+       urcu_ref_put(&chan->urcu_ref, release_channel);
+       urcu_ref_put(&chan->trace->urcu_ref, ltt_release_trace);
}

+static void remove_buf(struct urcu_ref *urcu_ref)
+{
+ struct ust_buffer *buf = _ust_container_of(urcu_ref, struct ust_buffer, urcu_ref);
+       destroy_buf(buf);
+}
+
+static void close_buf(struct ust_buffer *buf)
+{
+       urcu_ref_put(&buf->urcu_ref, remove_buf);
+}
+
+static void destroy_channel(struct urcu_ref *urcu_ref)
+{
+ struct ust_channel *chan = _ust_container_of(urcu_ref, struct ust_channel, urcu_ref);
+
+       free(chan);
+}
+
+static void release_channel(struct urcu_ref *urcu_ref)
+{
+       struct ust_channel *chan = _ust_container_of(urcu_ref,
+                       struct ust_channel, urcu_ref);
+
+       free(chan->buf);
+}
+
+static void close_channel(struct ust_channel *chan)
+{
+       int i;
+       if(!chan)
+               return;
+
+       pthread_mutex_lock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
+       for(i=0; i<chan->n_cpus; i++) {
+ /* FIXME: if we make it here, then all buffers were necessarily allocated. Moreover, we don't
+                * initialize to NULL so we cannot use this check. Should we? */
+               //ust//         if (chan->buf[i])
+               close_buf(chan->buf[i]);
+       }
+
+       cds_list_del(&chan->list);
+       urcu_ref_put(&chan->urcu_ref, destroy_channel);
+       pthread_mutex_unlock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
+}
+
+static void remove_channel(struct ust_channel *chan)
+{
+       close_channel(chan);
+       unmap_buf_structs(chan);
+       urcu_ref_put(&chan->urcu_ref, release_channel);
+}

static int open_channel(struct ust_channel *chan, size_t subbuf_size,
                        size_t subbuf_cnt)
@@ -308,6 +384,8 @@ static int open_channel(struct ust_channel *chan, size_t subbuf_size,
        chan->subbuf_size_order = get_count_order(subbuf_size);
        chan->alloc_size = subbuf_size * subbuf_cnt;

+       urcu_ref_init(&chan->urcu_ref);
+
        pthread_mutex_lock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
        for (i=0; i < chan->n_cpus; i++) {
                result = open_buf(chan, i);
@@ -327,29 +405,11 @@ error:
                do {} while(0);
        }

+       urcu_ref_put(&chan->urcu_ref, destroy_channel);
        pthread_mutex_unlock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
        return -1;
}

-static void close_channel(struct ust_channel *chan)
-{
-       int i;
-       if(!chan)
-               return;
-
-       pthread_mutex_lock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
-       for(i=0; i<chan->n_cpus; i++) {
- /* FIXME: if we make it here, then all buffers were necessarily allocated. Moreover, we don't
-        * initialize to NULL so we cannot use this check. Should we? */
-//ust//                if (chan->buf[i])
-                       close_buf(chan->buf[i]);
-       }
-
-       cds_list_del(&chan->list);
-
-       pthread_mutex_unlock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
-}
-
static void ltt_force_switch(struct ust_buffer *buf,
                enum force_switch_mode mode);

@@ -646,18 +706,6 @@ static int map_buf_structs(struct ust_channel *chan)
        return -1;
}

-static int unmap_buf_structs(struct ust_channel *chan)
-{
-       int i;
-
-       for (i=0; i < chan->n_cpus; i++) {
-               if (shmdt(chan->buf[i]) < 0) {
-                       PERROR("shmdt");
-               }
-       }
-       return 0;
-}
-
/*
 * Create channel.
 */
@@ -667,6 +715,8 @@ static int create_channel(const char *trace_name, struct ust_trace *trace,
{
        int i, result;

+       urcu_ref_init(&chan->urcu_ref);
+
        chan->trace = trace;
        chan->overwrite = overwrite;
        chan->n_subbufs_order = get_count_order(n_subbufs);
@@ -714,19 +764,6 @@ error:
        return -1;
}

-
-static void remove_channel(struct ust_channel *chan)
-{
-       close_channel(chan);
-
-       unmap_buf_structs(chan);
-
-       free(chan->buf_struct_shmids);
-
-       free(chan->buf);
-
-}
-
static void ltt_relay_async_wakeup_chan(struct ust_channel *ltt_channel)
{
//ust// unsigned int i;
--
1.7.4


_______________________________________________
ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev


_______________________________________________
ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev

Reply via email to