* Yannick Brosseau ([email protected]) wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yannick Brosseau <[email protected]>
> ---
>  libust/buffers.c |    9 ++++-----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libust/buffers.c b/libust/buffers.c
> index 4e8004c..534d0ef 100644
> --- a/libust/buffers.c
> +++ b/libust/buffers.c
> @@ -319,12 +319,11 @@ static int open_channel(struct ust_channel *chan, 
> size_t subbuf_size,
>  
>       return 0;
>  
> -     /* Jump directly inside the loop to close the buffers that were already
> -      * opened. */
> -     for(; i>=0; i--) {
> -             close_buf(chan->buf[i]);
>  error:
> -             do {} while(0);
> +     /* Loop through the opened buffers and close them. Skip the current i, 
> +        since it's the one that did not open. */
> +     for(i--; i>=0; i--) {
> +             close_buf(chan->buf[i]);

Not sure I see how this is more readable. You seem to be changing the
code behavior too.

Mathieu

>       }
>  
>       pthread_mutex_unlock(&ust_buffers_channels_mutex);
> -- 
> 1.7.2.3
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

_______________________________________________
ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev

Reply via email to