* Nils Carlson ([email protected]) wrote: > Yep. fixed. merged. > >>>> + /* >>>> + * FIXME: This could be prettier, we loop over the list twice and >>>> + * following good locking practice should lock around the loop >>>> + */ >>>> + cds_list_for_each_entry_safe(trace, trace_tmp, <t_traces.head, >>>> list) { >>>> + ltt_trace_destroy(trace->trace_name, 1); >>>> + }
So what' up with these missing locks ? Mathieu >>>> >>>> /* Clean up the listener socket and epoll, keeping the scoket >>>> file */ >>>> ustcomm_del_named_sock(listen_sock, 1); >>>> -- >>>> 1.7.1 >>>> >>>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > ltt-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
