* Mathieu Desnoyers ([email protected]) wrote: > * Nils Carlson ([email protected]) wrote: [...] > Please document that the caller must free the char * returned. > > > +char *ustcomm_user_sock_dir(void) > > +{
Actually, thinking about it a little more, we should probably even use a naming convention that tells us we need to free memory returned by the function return value pointer everywhere so that we can audit the caller code easily for missing "free()". e.g., in this case: char *ustcomm_alloc_user_sock_dir(void) Thoughts ? Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
