2011/4/6 Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>: > Hrm, I should probably do this, can you try this patch out ? Can you > test it and report if it fixes your problem ?
Thanks it fixes the problem. I made the corresponding changes in my architecture's trace-clock.h which is a copy & paste of the omap version. So I assume this would also work for the OMAP. Now I only have the clock mismatch between the cores to deal with, lttv complains for threads that are inserted before they are forked (range is 10 us - 10 ms mismatch depending on run). I think it is due to that the cores enters/leaves WFI unsynced and hence runs on cycle counter and 32kHz clock in a different pattern and I get some error due to this. So far I run cpufreq on performance to not introduce even more uncertainty. Have you tried the code on a OMAP4? Regards, Harald _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
