On 08/17/2011 11:56 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Shipping it as a .c file rather than a library (like gnulib) might also
> be a good way. Churn in this kind of code is actually a bad thing.
Shipping a .c will not be practical for non-gpl and non-lgpl
applications, at the very least, and will make library upgrades a real
challenge. Hence my preference for a .so.
Yes, a .c pretty much requires a special exception to the GPL, or to
give up copyleft.
Paolo
_______________________________________________
ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
