On 1 September 2011 00:38, Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]
> wrote:

>
> I have a client who would like this API to appear in UST 2.0 headers
> soon so they can use it in their instrumentation (even before those
> macros are actually implemented). So I think it makes sense to settle on
> this:
> ...
> So although I cannot say with a 100% confidence level that this will not
> change when I will implement the actual macros (planned for this Fall),
> I am fairly confident we should be fine with this API.
>
> Feedback is, as always, welcome.
>
>
Looks good to me, FWIW.

cheers.

--
Nathan
_______________________________________________
ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev

Reply via email to