* Lai Jiangshan ([email protected]) wrote: > To make it matches the comments. > > It is the caller's responsibility to use > set_cpu_call_rcu_data(cpu, NULL) to remove the CPU's > call_rcu_data structure and dispose it.
Merged, thanks! Mathieu > > Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]> > --- > urcu-call-rcu-impl.h | 8 ++++++++ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h b/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h > index c822646..ae93468 100644 > --- a/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h > +++ b/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h > @@ -396,11 +396,19 @@ int set_cpu_call_rcu_data(int cpu, struct call_rcu_data > *crdp) > errno = EINVAL; > return -EINVAL; > } > + > if (per_cpu_call_rcu_data == NULL) { > call_rcu_unlock(&call_rcu_mutex); > errno = ENOMEM; > return -ENOMEM; > } > + > + if (per_cpu_call_rcu_data[cpu] != NULL && crdp != NULL) { > + call_rcu_unlock(&call_rcu_mutex); > + errno = EEXIST; > + return -EEXIST; > + } > + > per_cpu_call_rcu_data[cpu] = crdp; > call_rcu_unlock(&call_rcu_mutex); > return 0; > -- > 1.7.4.4 > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
