Hi Stefan, * Stefan Hajnoczi ([email protected]) wrote: > Is usttrace still going to be around for LTTng 2.0? If not, maybe > these observations don't matter, but I wanted to discuss before I > forget them.
It's not going to be around in LTTng-UST 2.0. It might be worth fixing the UST 0.x tree though. > > usttrace in ust-bin Debian 0.15-3 does not handle spaces in > command-line arguments: > > # Prepare vars > CMD=$* > [...] > # Execute the command > $CMD 2>&1 > ) | tee "$OUTDIR/app.log" > > My temporary fix was: > > # Execute the command > "@" 2>&1 > > Since I was tracing a curses application it turned out redirecting > stdout/stderr wasn't helpful ;). So I dropped the app.log and > redirection. Capturing application output is not useful in this case. I guess keeping the redirection would be helpful in the general case though. > > If you can point me to the git repo that has usttrace I'm happy to > send patches. I have to admit I failed to find usttrace in the git > repos, I must be looking in the wrong place ;). It's at: http://git.lttng.org/?p=ust.git;a=summary (git://git.lttng.org/ust.git) (master branch) You'll find "usttrace" in the root of the tree. Even though UST 0.x is in maintainance-only mode, this is the kind of fix that I would pull for an eventual 0.15.1 bugfix-only release. Thanks! Mathieu > > Thanks, > Stefan > > _______________________________________________ > ltt-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
