On 11/22/2011 05:58 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Lai Jiangshan ([email protected]) wrote:
>> Fast path is not changed.
>> It will slow down very little for slow path.
> 
> it cleans up the code, so it's generally fine with me. There is just one
> part that I don't understand, see below,
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  rculfhash.c |  100 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
>>  1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/rculfhash.c b/rculfhash.c
>> index bda3bd6..b0c7de5 100644
>> --- a/rculfhash.c
>> +++ b/rculfhash.c
>> @@ -755,18 +755,14 @@ unsigned long 
>> _uatomic_xchg_monotonic_increase(unsigned long *ptr,
>>      return old2;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static
>> -struct cds_lfht_node *lookup_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size,
>> -            unsigned long hash)
>> +static inline
>> +struct cds_lfht_node *bucket_at(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long index)
>>  {
>> -    unsigned long index, order;
>> -
>> -    assert(size > 0);
>> -    index = hash & (size - 1);
>> +    unsigned long order;
>>  
>> -    if (index < ht->min_alloc_size) {
>> -            dbg_printf("lookup hash %lu index %lu order 0 aridx 0\n",
>> -                       hash, index);
>> +    if ((__builtin_constant_p(index) && index == 0)
>> +                    || index < ht->min_alloc_size) {
>> +            dbg_printf("bucket index %lu order 0 aridx 0\n", index);
>>              return &ht->t.tbl[0]->nodes[index];
>>      }
>>      /*
>> @@ -775,11 +771,19 @@ struct cds_lfht_node *lookup_bucket(struct cds_lfht 
>> *ht, unsigned long size,
>>       * get_count_order_ulong.
>>       */
>>      order = fls_ulong(index);
>> -    dbg_printf("lookup hash %lu index %lu order %lu aridx %lu\n",
>> -               hash, index, order, index & ((1UL << (order - 1)) - 1));
>> +    dbg_printf("bucket index %lu order %lu aridx %lu\n",
>> +               index, order, index & ((1UL << (order - 1)) - 1));
>>      return &ht->t.tbl[order]->nodes[index & ((1UL << (order - 1)) - 1)];
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline
>> +struct cds_lfht_node *lookup_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size,
>> +            unsigned long hash)
>> +{
>> +    assert(size > 0);
>> +    return bucket_at(ht, hash & (size - 1));
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * Remove all logically deleted nodes from a bucket up to a certain node 
>> key.
>>   */
>> @@ -1105,19 +1109,18 @@ static
>>  void init_table_populate_partition(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long i,
>>                                 unsigned long start, unsigned long len)
>>  {
>> -    unsigned long j;
>> +    unsigned long j, size = 1UL << (i - 1);
>>  
>>      assert(i > ht->min_alloc_order);
>>      ht->cds_lfht_rcu_read_lock();
>> -    for (j = start; j < start + len; j++) {
>> -            struct cds_lfht_node *new_node = &ht->t.tbl[i]->nodes[j];
>> -
>> -            dbg_printf("init populate: i %lu j %lu hash %lu\n",
>> -                       i, j, (1UL << (i - 1)) + j);
>> -            new_node->reverse_hash =
>> -                            bit_reverse_ulong((1UL << (i - 1)) + j);
>> -            _cds_lfht_add(ht, NULL, NULL, 1UL << (i - 1),
>> -                            new_node, NULL, 1);
>> +    for (j = start + size; j < size + start + len; j++) {
> 
> Please use "j = size + start; j < size + start + len;"
> 
>> +            struct cds_lfht_node *new_node = bucket_at(ht, j);
>> +
>> +            assert(j >= size && j < (size << 1));
>> +            dbg_printf("init populate: order %lu index %lu hash %lu\n",
>> +                       i, j, j);
>> +            new_node->reverse_hash = bit_reverse_ulong(j);
>> +            _cds_lfht_add(ht, NULL, NULL, size, new_node, NULL, 1);
>>      }
>>      ht->cds_lfht_rcu_read_unlock();
>>  }
>> @@ -1205,18 +1208,18 @@ static
>>  void remove_table_partition(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long i,
>>                          unsigned long start, unsigned long len)
>>  {
>> -    unsigned long j;
>> +    unsigned long j, size = 1UL << (i - 1);
>>  
>>      assert(i > ht->min_alloc_order);
>>      ht->cds_lfht_rcu_read_lock();
>> -    for (j = start; j < start + len; j++) {
>> -            struct cds_lfht_node *fini_node = &ht->t.tbl[i]->nodes[j];
>> -
>> -            dbg_printf("remove entry: i %lu j %lu hash %lu\n",
>> -                       i, j, (1UL << (i - 1)) + j);
>> -            fini_node->reverse_hash =
>> -                    bit_reverse_ulong((1UL << (i - 1)) + j);
>> -            (void) _cds_lfht_del(ht, 1UL << (i - 1), fini_node, 1);
>> +    for (j = size + start; j < size + start + len; j++) {
>> +            struct cds_lfht_node *fini_node = bucket_at(ht, j);
>> +
>> +            assert(j >= size && j < (size << 1));
>> +            dbg_printf("remove entry: order %lu index %lu hash %lu\n",
>> +                       i, j, j);
>> +            fini_node->reverse_hash = bit_reverse_ulong(j);
>> +            (void) _cds_lfht_del(ht, size, fini_node, 1);
>>      }
>>      ht->cds_lfht_rcu_read_unlock();
>>  }
>> @@ -1293,14 +1296,15 @@ static
>>  void cds_lfht_create_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size)
>>  {
>>      struct cds_lfht_node *prev, *node;
>> -    unsigned long order, len, i, j;
>> +    unsigned long order, len, i;
>>  
>>      ht->t.tbl[0] = calloc(1, ht->min_alloc_size * sizeof(struct 
>> cds_lfht_node));
>>      assert(ht->t.tbl[0]);
>>  
>> -    dbg_printf("create bucket: order %lu index %lu hash %lu\n", 0, 0, 0);
>> -    ht->t.tbl[0]->nodes[0].next = flag_bucket(get_end());
>> -    ht->t.tbl[0]->nodes[0].reverse_hash = 0;
>> +    dbg_printf("create bucket: order 0 index 0 hash 0\n");
>> +    node = bucket_at(ht, 0);
>> +    node->next = flag_bucket(get_end());
>> +    node->reverse_hash = 0;
>>  
>>      for (order = 1; order < get_count_order_ulong(size) + 1; order++) {
>>              len = 1UL << (order - 1);
>> @@ -1311,22 +1315,15 @@ void cds_lfht_create_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht, 
>> unsigned long size)
>>                      assert(ht->t.tbl[order]);
>>              }
>>  
> 
> below is the change I fail to understand. I think I'd need to be walked
> through this change with an explanation, which could be added as a
> comment telling what this function is doing.

The "if else if" code simulates the code of "set prev as the bucket with 
index=i".
it is "bucket_at(ht, i)".

Now, we are trying to init the node with the hash=(i+len) (which is also
a bucket with index=(i+len)) to the hash table, so this node has to be inserted
after the bucket with index=i. And because there is no other non-bucket node
nor bucket node with larger index inserted, so the bucket node with 
index=(i+len)
should be inserted directly linked after the bucket node with index=i.


> 
>> -            i = 0;
>> -            prev = ht->t.tbl[i]->nodes;
>> -            for (j = 0; j < len; j++) {
>> -                    if (j & (j - 1)) {      /* Between power of 2 */
>> -                            prev++;
>> -                    } else if (j) {         /* At each power of 2 */
>> -                            i++;
>> -                            prev = ht->t.tbl[i]->nodes;
>> -                    }
>> +            for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>> +                    prev = bucket_at(ht, i);
>> +                    node = bucket_at(ht, i + len);
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev

Reply via email to