On 12-01-05 10:42 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
Use portable shell macros wherever possible.

Change the mfence check to actually check for the assembly function,
instead of relying on the architecture's name.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Montplaisir<[email protected]>
---
  Makefile.am  |    2 +
  bootstrap    |    6 +-
  configure.ac |  265 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
  3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index a7d3316..a14029b 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS=-I config
+
  INCLUDES = -I$(top_builddir)/urcu

  #Add the -version-info directly here since we are only building
diff --git a/bootstrap b/bootstrap
index c507425..c71b862 100755
--- a/bootstrap
+++ b/bootstrap
@@ -4,9 +4,5 @@ set -x
  if [ ! -e config ]; then
        mkdir config
  fi
-aclocal
-libtoolize --force --copy
-autoheader
-automake --add-missing --copy
-autoconf

+autoreconf -i
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 5a90008..0311246 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -9,23 +9,21 @@ AC_INIT([userspace-rcu],[0.6.7],[mathieu dot desnoyers at 
efficios dot com])
  AC_SUBST([URCU_LIBRARY_VERSION], [1:0:0])

  AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([config])
+AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([config])
  AC_CANONICAL_TARGET
  AC_CANONICAL_HOST
  AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign dist-bzip2 no-dist-gzip])
  m4_ifdef([AM_SILENT_RULES], [AM_SILENT_RULES([yes])])

  AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([urcu.h])
-AM_PROG_MKDIR_P

  AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h urcu/config.h])

-# Keep at the end to do not pollute installed header.
  AH_TEMPLATE([CONFIG_RCU_SMP], [Enable SMP support. With SMP support enabled, 
uniprocessors are also supported. With SMP support disabled, UP systems work 
fine, but the behavior of SMP systems is undefined.])
  AH_TEMPLATE([CONFIG_RCU_HAVE_FENCE], [Defined when on a system that has 
memory fence instructions.])
  AH_TEMPLATE([CONFIG_RCU_HAVE_FUTEX], [Defined when on a system with futex 
support.])
-AH_TEMPLATE([CONFIG_RCU_COMPAT_ARCH], [Compatibility mode for i386 which lacks
-cmpxchg instruction.])
-AH_TEMPLATE([CONFIG_RCU_ARM_HAVE_DMB], [Use the dmb instruction is available 
for use on ARM.])
+AH_TEMPLATE([CONFIG_RCU_COMPAT_ARCH], [Compatibility mode for i386 which lacks 
cmpxchg instruction.])
+AH_TEMPLATE([CONFIG_RCU_ARM_HAVE_DMB], [Use the dmb instruction if available 
for use on ARM.])

  # Checks for programs.
  AC_PROG_CC
@@ -43,105 +41,90 @@ AC_FUNC_MMAP
  AC_CHECK_FUNCS([bzero gettimeofday munmap sched_getcpu strtoul sysconf])

  # Find arch type
-case $host_cpu in
-       i386) ARCHTYPE="x86"; SUBARCHTYPE="x86compat" ;;
-       i486) ARCHTYPE="x86";;
-       i586) ARCHTYPE="x86";;
-       i686) ARCHTYPE="x86";;
-       amd64) ARCHTYPE="x86";;
-       x86_64) ARCHTYPE="x86";;
-       powerpc) ARCHTYPE="ppc" ;;
-       ppc64) ARCHTYPE="ppc" ;;
-       powerpc64) ARCHTYPE="ppc" ;;
-       ppc) ARCHTYPE="ppc" ;;
-       s390) ARCHTYPE="s390" ;;
-       s390x) ARCHTYPE="s390" ;;
-       sparc64) ARCHTYPE="sparc64" ;;
-       alpha*) ARCHTYPE="alpha" ;;
-       ia64) ARCHTYPE="gcc" ;;

ARCHTYPE = gcc? I left it as-is, but is this a typo? In any case it doesn't seem to be used anywhere.

-       arm*) ARCHTYPE="arm" ;;
-       *) ARCHTYPE="unknown";;
-esac
-
-if test "x$ARCHTYPE" = "xarm" ; then
-AC_MSG_CHECKING([checking for dmb instruction])
-AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[
-]], [[
-asm volatile("dmb":::"memory");
-]])],[
-       AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
-       AC_DEFINE([CONFIG_RCU_ARM_HAVE_DMB], [1])
-
-],[
-       AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
+AS_CASE([$host_cpu],
+       [i386], [ARCHTYPE="x86"&&  SUBARCHTYPE="x86compat"],
+       [i486], [ARCHTYPE="x86"],
+       [i586], [ARCHTYPE="x86"],
+       [i686], [ARCHTYPE="x86"],
+       [amd64], [ARCHTYPE="x86"],
+       [x86_64], [ARCHTYPE="x86"],
+       [powerpc], [ARCHTYPE="ppc"],
+       [ppc64], [ARCHTYPE="ppc"],
+       [powerpc64], [ARCHTYPE="ppc"],
+       [ppc], [ARCHTYPE="ppc"],
+       [s390], [ARCHTYPE="s390"],
+       [s390x], [ARCHTYPE="s390"],
+       [sparc64], [ARCHTYPE="sparc64"],
+       [alpha*], [ARCHTYPE="alpha"],
+       [ia64], [ARCHTYPE="gcc"],
+       [arm*], [ARCHTYPE="arm"],
+       [ARCHTYPE="unknown"]
+)

-])
-fi
+AC_SUBST(ARCHTYPE)
+AC_SUBST(SUBARCHTYPE)

  UATOMICSRC=urcu/uatomic/$ARCHTYPE.h
  ARCHSRC=urcu/arch/$ARCHTYPE.h
-if test "$ARCHTYPE" == "armv7l"; then
-       CFLAGS="-mcpu=cortex-a9 -mtune=cortex-a9 -O"
-fi

-AC_SUBST(ARCHTYPE)
-AC_SUBST(SUBARCHTYPE)
+AS_IF([test "x$SUBARCHTYPE" = xx86compat],[
+       AC_DEFINE([CONFIG_RCU_COMPAT_ARCH], [1])
+])
+
+AS_IF([test "$host_cpu" = "armv7l"],[

I assumed we did not want ARCHTYPE here, that can't be set to "armv7l".
But shouldn't we use $target_cpu instead (here and in the test above)?

+       CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -mcpu=cortex-a9 -mtune=cortex-a9 -O1"
+])

[...]


_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

Reply via email to