* Arshad, Adeel ([email protected]) wrote: > > Hi Mathieu, > > Thanks for the prompt reply. Yes your guess is right I am testing this stuff > on older versions i.e ust 0.12 and Linux kernel 2.6.32. > I have already checked the formatting of patch as per the Linux Kernel patch > submission standards [ scripts/checkpatch.pl ]. And regarding the Project > Maintainers, when I run the get_maintainer.pl script on my patch I get the > following list, should I include all of them in CC ? > > ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit > ~/MEL-5/melbsp-115/upstream-patches/trace-clock-userspace-arm.patch > > Russell King <[email protected]> > Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> > [email protected] > [email protected] > [email protected]
Probably not. Better to keep it local to [email protected], since LTTng has been removed from Linux staging. Mainline Linux seems to focus on perf/ftrace nowadays. By the way, if you have patches that change the Linux kernel, we'll need to modify them so the ABIs exposed go through the /proc/lttng ioctls and mmap. Thanks, Mathieu > > --- > Regards. > > Adeel Arshad | Senior Software Development Engineer > Mentor Embedded™ | Lahore, Pakistan > P +92.42.36099197 | M +92.322.4616474 > > Nucleus® | Linux® | Android™ | Services | UI | Multi-OS > > Android is a trademark of Google Inc. Use of this trademark is subject to > Google Permissions. > Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other > countries. > ________________________________________ > From: Mathieu Desnoyers [[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 6:59 PM > To: Arshad, Adeel > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] User-space and kernel-space time stamps > synchronisation. > > Hi! > > Did you do this work for lttng and ust 0.x or lttng/lttng-ust 2.0 ? > > In both cases, you can send the code as a set of [RFC patch project] to > begin with, and we'll let you know if some changes are needed. > > Please follow the Linux kernel patch submission guide lines for > formatting, and send those to [email protected], CC'ing the > project maintainer. > > In terms of mainlining, we'll certainly be interested to integrate your > work into LTTng 2.1 (we plan to keep the monotonic clock for lttng 2.0). > As far as 0.x is concerned, it's been feature-frozen for a while, so if > your patch targets this version, we might have to adapt it to LTTng 2.0. > > Best regards, > > Mathieu > > * Arshad, Adeel ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Hope to find you all in good health. My name is Adeel Arshad. And I am > > working at Mentor Graphics as a Senior Software Engineer. > > I have worked on User-space and kernel-space time stamps synchronisation > > for ARM architecture. We like to contribute to Lttng development and hence > > like to upstream the patch. Please guide me how to proceed further. > > > > --- > > Regards. > > > > Adeel Arshad | Senior Software Development Engineer > > Mentor Embedded™ | Lahore, Pakistan > > P +92.42.36099197 | M +92.322.4616474 > > > > Nucleus® | Linux® | Android™ | Services | UI | Multi-OS > > > > Android is a trademark of Google Inc. Use of this trademark is subject to > > Google Permissions. > > Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other > > countries. > > _______________________________________________ > > lttng-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev > > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
