On 12-04-03 08:59 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > We should probably put a kernel version compability matrix,
Oh god, please, no... I'm still having nightmares from http://git.lttng.org/?p=lttv.git;a=blob_plain;f=doc/developer/lttng-lttv-compatibility.html;hb=HEAD ;) Granted, the minimum requirement could be advertised a bit more prominently (on the lttng2.0 page for example). Also, I remember someone being able to run it on 2.6.35 by backporting 1 or 2 kernel patches. Perhaps it'd be worth re-testing and documenting this procedure somewhere? Cheers, -- Alexandre Montplaisir DORSAL lab, École Polytechnique de Montréal _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
