On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Jon Bernard <[email protected]> wrote: > * Jon Bernard <[email protected]> wrote: >> * Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Jon, >> > >> > I wanted to get in touch with you regarding LTTng 2.0 Debian packages. >> > Is there anything we can do to help you getting those packages into >> > Debian ? They have been out for a while now, and even Ubuntu picked them >> > up. I understand that you are probably busy, hence my offer for help. >> >> I've just uploaded another package I've been working on and LTTng 2.0 >> packages >> are next on my list. Give me a few days to get things sorted, I'll post an >> update next week with my status. > > Is the 2.0 series indented to replace the existing UST, or should they be able > to exist side-by-side? I'm inclined to think the new packages should replace > the old ones, and thus prevent a user from having both installed at the same > time, but wanted to check first.
Yes, the 2.0 should replace the old 0.x ones. The new lttng-ust replace the old ust. Also you can replace the old lttctl with the new lttng-tools. > URCU is updated and I'm looking at UST/CTL now. I'll file ITPs for babeltrace > and modules in the morning. > > -- > Jon > > _______________________________________________ > lttng-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev -- Yannick Brosseau yannickbrosseau.com _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
