-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I agree with that.
The main reason for extras/ is the fact that, for now, this lib would not be supported meaning that if liblttng-ctl changes, these bindings will NOT follow it unless someone submit a patch. If we decide at some point to fully support it, I have no problem seeing it in src/ Cheers! David On 01/08/12 11:13 AM, Christian Babeux wrote: >> - From my point of view, I'm not sure it is, for now, a good idea since >> it adds a considerable amount work to fully support (at least on my side) >> a library that is an extra functionality and for that I see this in >> extras/ for now. > > +1 for extras. I suggest extras/bindings/swig/python. The Apache Subversion > project has a similar tree [1]. > > Christian > > [1] - > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQGVMWAAoJEELoaioR9I02m7gH/2cnsQ4x4fmdmKKy422l7e9c 8mzsgkWR2NsJHF7d0E7lvg0Be8nsxq59FD0xvN1jqoh4I+aeMt+0Ulz/Z4Gr6c3U gXLRjDPGyIrkGdL/bFase6WZQKHtvI+6sDIgxDj0TbSjeZ0YOOaAASP6eFTOaWF1 DhyJBtkIIVb8pjU8dYMMWFSkFhlGpCYDangnx09OSY15+AiLQIYd1HJdZoDHwfjP M9V3cPEqvDFmc4H0qkgX4g5ACN8XlvSN2TZGimDo7KP8qMSRtBxTEy8GrOwXMi+O pdNVu1gk+f0tAwTFCPGSAXFCv2/B4/wDnBTvu/m06p/NB5sihsskdv3rXK3o4DQ= =VL+7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
