* Matthew Khouzam ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi tracing paladins, > I was going over the most recent CTF specs. I am curious, at the line: > 1176 "model.emf.uri = "string";" this looks like a reference to > something from eclipse modeling framework. > http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/javadoc/2.7.0/org/eclipse/emf/common/util/URI.html > > Is this part of the CTF specification? Shouldn't this be called > model.uri or model_uri to respect the naming convention?
if we only call it model.uri, and come up with other model URIs that we want to encode in the future (not emf-related), then we would be stucked, wouldn't we ? What is the benefit of removing the "emf" part ? Thanks, Mathieu > > I hope someone could clarify this. > > Matthew > > _______________________________________________ > lttng-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
