Hi all,
I performed a userspace trace of a multi-threaded application that uses
prctl(PR_SET_NAME, ...) to give its threads names. From the output of 'lttng
view' below (I removed timestamps to make it shorter), it appears that UST is
populating the "procname" by getting the process/thread name from the first
thread it sees for a given PID, then assuming that name applies to all threads
in the process:
mydaemon:22593 mydaemon:start: { <cpu_id> }, { pthread_id = 1496398144,
procname = "mythread31", vtid = 22761, vpid = 22593 }, { <payload> }
mydaemon:22593 mydaemon:end: { <cpu_id> }, { pthread_id = 1496398144, procname
= "mythread31", vtid = 22761, vpid = 22593 }, { <payload> }
myclient:28277 myclient:end: { <cpu_id> }, { pthread_id = 47216641758592, vtid
= 28277, vpid = 28277, procname = "myclient" }, { <payload> }
myclient:28277 myclient:start: { <cpu_id> }, { pthread_id = 47216641758592,
vtid = 28277, vpid = 28277, procname = "myclient" }, { <payload> }
mydaemon:22593 mydaemon:start: { <cpu_id> }, { pthread_id = 1485908288,
procname = "mythread31", vtid = 22760, vpid = 22593 }, { <payload> }
On the first line, the procname contains the thread name for vtid = 22761. On
the last line, the procname is still shown as "mythread31", but the vtid is
different, and I can see from /proc/22593/task/22760/stat that the thread's
name is "mythread30". However, the <process name>:<PID> at the start of each
line - the pair before the <trace provider>:<tracepoint name> - does show the
actual process name rather than any thread name.
I'm using LTTng 2.0.4 and babeltrace 1.0.0.rc5. I set up my trace using these
steps:
lttng create
lttng enable-channel channel0 --userspace
lttng add-context --userspace -t vpid -t vtid -t procname -t pthread_id
lttng enable-event --userspace --all
It would be great if "procname" was replaced by "threadname" and showed each
thread's name correctly, since the process's name is already shown, but the
thread names would be very useful. Otherwise, at the very least, "procname"
should probably show the same thing that is shown at the start of the line
rather than incorrectly using the name of one of the threads.
Incidentally, why do I have to do "enable-channel" to get the context to
actually appear? If I don't do this, the "add-context" still says that each of
the four contexts was "added to all channels", but they don't appear in 'lttng
view'.
Thanks in advance,
David
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this transmission may be confidential. Any
disclosure, copying, or further distribution of confidential information is not
permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by Quantum.
Quantum reserves the right to have electronic communications, including email
and attachments, sent across its networks filtered through anti virus and spam
software programs and retain such messages in order to comply with applicable
data security and retention requirements. Quantum is not responsible for the
proper and complete transmission of the substance of this communication or for
any delay in its receipt.
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
