First detail: please remove dot from subject end of line. * Simon Marchi ([email protected]) wrote: > Signed-off-by: Simon Marchi <[email protected]> > --- > configure.ac | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index 7f12f23..97a9f65 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ changequote([,])dnl > armv5) LIBFORMAT="elf32-littlearm"; NO_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=1 ;; > arm) LIBFORMAT="elf32-littlearm"; NO_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=1 ;; > mips*) LIBFORMAT=""; NO_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=1;; > + tile) LIBFORMAT="elf64-tilegx-le"; NO_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=1;;
Not sure how this works, but I think there exists other "tile" flavors out there besides the tilegx. Will they appear as "tile" from an autotools point of view and then break when we specify their libformat as elf64-tilegx-le ? Are there any way to distinguish between flavors ? Please ask advice to Tilera if needed. Thanks, Mathieu > *) AC_MSG_ERROR([unable to detect library format (unsupported > architecture ($host_cpu)?)]) ;; > esac > AC_SUBST(LIBFORMAT) > -- > 1.7.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > lttng-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
